![[photo] Saperda calcarata on aspen stem (Mike Ostry, USDA FS Northern Research Station)](../img/hlth/28_tn.jpg) |
| Saperda calcarata on aspen stem (Mike Ostry, USDA FS Northern Research Station) |
Trembling
aspen, bigtooth
aspen and balsam
poplar share most
insects and diseases.
Of the three, bigtooth
aspen tends to be
longer lived and
has fewer health
related problems
than the other two
species. All three
species are considered
short-lived. Aspens
have thin bark and
shallow root systems
and are therefore
easily wounded and
subject to invasion
by stain and decay
organisms. Predicting
stand longevity
and overall health
can be difficult
for aspens largely
because of the complicated
interactions that
occur between genetically
diverse clones,
stand age, stand
density and site
quality.
Detailed
information on
specific pest problems
are described and
discussed in the
section titled Specific
pest concerns .
Pests are described
based upon what
part of a tree
they damage.
This section
provides
links to additional
management guides
and identification
aides. Further
pest information
can also be obtained
in a section
on Pest
problems
and stand development.
This
section details
specific pest
problems that
are most likely
to occur during
various stages
in stand development.
![[photo] Aspen clones are often distinguishable in autumn when the foliage changes colors and leaf abscission begins (2006, M. Ostry, USDA FS Northern Research Station)](img/ASPEN_SCENIC_tn.jpg) |
Aspen clones are often distinguishable in autumn when the foliage changes colors and leaf abscission begins (2006, M. Ostry, USDA FS Northern Research Station)
|
Clones
and aspen forest
health
Most
Lake States aspen
stands have developed
from root suckers,
creating stands
made up of a mosaic
of genetically
different clones.
The genetic diversity
among clones within
stands has been
a key to minimizing
large scale damage
from insect pests
and diseases. Over
time, superior clones
expand and replace
clones that cannot
compete or that
are susceptible
to damage by insect
pests and diseases.
The incidence and
severity of two major diseases, hypoxylon
canker and white
trunk rot, is strongly
influenced by clone.
Tree
and stand age
and aspen forest
health
Young
aspen stands can
have very high levels
of stem mortality,
sometimes exceeding
80 percent. But,
as long as initial
stand density is
high, this mortality
is generally viewed
as having a beneficial
thinning role. Many
aspen stands will
go through 2-3 natural
thinning events
during stand development.
Aspen
trees are not long-lived
and stand deterioration
or breakup can
occur anywhere from
age 35-90. The age
at which any given
stand deteriorates
is influenced not
only by age but
by clone, site
quality, weather,
damage from insects
pests and diseases
and other factors.
This process starts
with a slowing of
growth at maturity,
holes occur in the
canopy as individual
trees begin to die
or break due to
increasing prevalence
of wood decay. As
the canopy opens,
trees are subject
to increased exposure
to wind, sunlight
and evaporation.
This increases
tree stress reducing
the vigor of the
remaining trees.
Stand deterioration
can occur quickly,
sometimes within
2-5 years the majority
of the aspen canopy
can be killed or
broken by wind,
snow or ice.
![[photo] Defoliated aspen with a conifer understory (S. Katovich, USDA FS Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry)](img/ASPEN_CONIFER_TN.jpg) |
| Defoliated aspen with a conifer understory (S. Katovich, USDA FS Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry) |
Defoliation
and aspen forest
health
Aspen
stands are often
subject to periods
of complete defoliation
(leaf-loss) due
to outbreaks of
caterpillars or
leaf beetles. This
is more common on
aspens than any
other forest type
in the Lake States.
Forest tent caterpillar
and large aspen
tortrix are the
most likely culprits,
though a number
of insects eat aspen
leaves. These defoliation
events can be massive
in scale with millions
of acres of defoliated
trees in any given
year. Aspen trees
are very tolerant
of defoliation and
widespread tree
mortality following
these outbreaks
is rare. However,
intense and prolonged
defoliation can
play an important
role in the rate
of stand breakup
in old-age stands.
| |
|
| |
Young dense aspen stand (Mike Ostry, USDA FS Northern Research Station) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Hypoxylon
canker |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Old
stand in break
up stage |
| |
|
Stand
density and aspen
forest health
Numerous
examples exist that
illustrate the importance
of tree density
and the incidence
of aspen diseases
and insects. In
poorly stocked stands
aspen branches persist,
often these branches
are attacked by
twig and shoot feeding
insects. Wounds
caused by insects
provide entry points
for fungi, including
the fungus that
causes hypoxylon
canker. This can
result in a high
incidence of stem
cankers in under-stocked
stands.
The
most important disease
that often results
in aspen mortality
in the lake states
is hypoxylon canker.
It has been shown
that stand density
can have a major
influence on the
incidence and severity
of this disease.
Aspen along stand
edges and in poorly
stocked stands are
more likely to have
a higher incidence
of hypoxylon canker.
Managers applying
strategies to increase
growth and yield
and shorten aspen
rotations such as
thinning stands
may need to consider
how reducing stem
density within a
stand may have the
unexpected consequence
of increasing disease
incidence and severity.
Site
quality and aspen
forest health
Site
quality plays an
important role in
the health of all
of our forest tree
species. But, it
often becomes an
overriding concern
with aspen simply
because aspen stands
occur on such a
wide variety of
sites. As a pioneer
species, trembling
aspen can be found
growing on very
dry, outwash sands;
to very wet, lowland
forest types; to
everything in between
those two extremes.
As a generalization,
the best aspen growth
and longest life
span is correlated
with more mesic,
nutrient rich sites,
and shorter life
spans correlate
with very dry and
very wet sites.
Overall
forest health
strategy
It
is possible to manage
aspen stands to
reduce insect and
disease risk. The
emphasis should
be on long-term
strategies focused
on growing aspen
on appropriate sites
and in well stocked
stands. Older aspen
stands deteriorate,
often quite quickly,
and maintaining
older aspen for
long time periods
is unrealistic.
Opportunities to
manipulate clones
to favor superior,
disease resistant
clones should be
considered.